Yes, we absolutely could do better with our spending of money.
I'm very familiar with the Hammer Heads program. We participate in the Hammer Heads program, and it has been a very successful program for us. You're right when you say that we fund this totally on our own with the help of the other building trades.
It again comes back to spending money. It makes complete sense when you're in a low-demand occupation and you're only working six or seven months of the year: you want to change occupations. The better spending of moneys you're talking about should be to give that individual, whether male or female, an opportunity to immediately access funds to put him or her into training.
I have a document here that states that you're penalized if you haven't been unemployed for 26 weeks. I don't understand that. Why would somebody in a low-demand trade or work environment have to be out of work and on employment insurance for 26 weeks before he's allowed second career training eligibility, especially when this individual could have a three-kid family? No, sir, or no, ma'am, you have to stay unemployed for 26 weeks before you can get the money for second careers.
If we could train those individuals more quickly with the funds they need right away, we could put them into a high-demand trade, one where we're interviewing for foreign workers right now. So yes, we could spend our money much more wisely.