That's really the most recent development, the most significant one. I have a dispute panel resolution decision that was made in the case of a crane operator, and it is very revealing regarding the effectiveness of chapter 7, which promotes the mobility of trade.
Fifty years ago when the Red Seal program was established, it was a program to promote mobility. Since the amendments in 2009, as I mentioned in my speech, an individual certified in one jurisdiction doesn't need to go through an additional assessment or requirement or testing to be certified in that other jurisdiction. In that sense they are fully mobile.
The part we do not control, which proves to be a bit more challenging, is that the employers retain what I would call the hiring decision. Obviously sometimes they may have an additional requirement that we're not aware of, or it can be just a union controlling a certain sector of the economy. Certainly in construction, unions have a big say in terms of which worker can go into which environment. These are obstacles we don't necessarily have a grasp over, but in terms of making sure the certificates, the credentials of individuals, are fully recognized between provinces, the Agreement on Internal Trade is what I would call the social safety net.
There was a dispute panel resolution on a crane operator. A crane operator from Quebec wanted to operate in Ontario and was denied his licence because this category of licence didn't exist in Ontario, and Ontario was arguing that there were differences in the number of hours of training. The panel found that the individual actually matched a certain category in Ontario, and it instructed the Ontario government to give a licence to that particular individual and to pay damages of $1,500.