This is why there's specific phrasing here. There's a probability. The police believe there is a probability of a criminal act involved because that's where the parents get hung up with the legal system, with prosecution—all those sorts of things. There are so many runaways. We know that, but sometimes there are abductions. When the police start getting involved, when the policing authority believes there is a probability of a criminal act, that's where the benefit for the murdered or missing children comes in. If it's found out afterwards that it was not the circumstance, the parents will not be required to pay it back. As I mentioned earlier, if one of the parents is found to be culpable of the criminal act, then the parent who receives the benefit will definitely be required to pay back the benefit.
On October 18th, 2012. See this statement in context.