That's your seven seconds.
I'll exercise the chairman's prerogative here and I'll use the last 14 minutes to ask my round.
I have two quick questions, really, to any of the panellists.
We had the parents of children who had been lost through crime in the other day. They had very compelling stories. Obviously the legislation treats those who lose a child through an illness differently. Parents of a child criminally abducted can receive 52 weeks of leave without pay. Should the child be found, the parent can get two weeks before they must return to work. Should the child die, the parents can take up to 104 weeks of unpaid leave.
In the case of a critically ill child, they get 37 weeks of leave without pay, but should that child die, they have to be back the following week, so if their child dies on a Thursday, then they have to be back to work on the Monday. That's how we interpret the legislation.
Do you see that there should be some provision...? Could you give me your views with regard to the grieving process of losing a child through illness, or losing a child through a criminal act? Is there a great distinction between the grieving processes? Should there be consideration made for those parents who lose a child through illness?