I'll make a comment that really sprang from the last witness. Perhaps I could direct this to Mr. Moreau. It's with regard to the stacking provisions, and I'll use a line that's often used by the government benches, ad nauseam. On the stacking provisions, as I understood it...I was reaching to find where the big benefit was for the witness, because I thought those provisions were already there. I got clarification from Ms. Leitch on it.
Mr. Moreau, in your testimony you said those stacking provisions already existed under former Bill C-49, which was presented in the House in 2002 and which the Conservatives voted against. The Conservatives, the Reformers, the Alliance—whatever they might have been at that time—voted against those provisions.
You said, and you made reference that you've successfully argued this point, that those provisions exist.
Can we have your comments on it?