I can understand Mr. Coleman's reaction but I want to remind everyone that we all said, on the very first day we started this study, that we would support the Bill. So, I would not want us to be led astray. We have the duty to support the Bill, but we also have the duty to underline the parts of the Bill that had been challenged by the witnesses.
What we heard was so touching and fundamental in the life of those families. And I want to make something absolutely clear to everyone: our approach has been totally open right from the start. So, I do not believe that my friend has changed his position because he has used the word "criticism". That is absolutely not the case. I have the duty to tell those things. When I speak, I do not speak on behalf of François Lapointe, I speak on behalf of all those parents who said that they did not understand why the limit would have to be set at 18 years of age. That is why we are moving that amendment and why we hope the government will support it.