We don't have an opportunity to debate the motion itself because you're ruling before anybody gets to debate anything, and then our only alternative is to challenge the chair. I understand that challenges to the chair in themselves are not debatable.
My only point is that it is difficult for this whole committee to understand the reasoning behind the challenge of the chair without the mover of the challenge being able to explain their reasoning.
I'm not asking for debate, just for an explanation of the reasoning for the challenge to the chair.