Maybe I could ask a specific question about stackability.
This came up in the testimony Mr. Moreau presented. What he shared with us on the court case that he pursued was that you were able to stack the provisions in the past. He took that case to court and he won.
The department didn't appeal that decision, so is the department saying that they agree with the decision and that they believed all along, since the change in the laws in 2002, that we were always able to stack these provisions, which was the judge's ruling?