Yes, absolutely; many of them are unionized. That's exactly right.
However, there are more people who are entitled to those holidays than there are unionized people. Under those circumstances, will the employer necessarily make changes and reduce the payments? That's not clear.
Those who may lose out are probably people who work over 15 days out of 30, but who do not work more than 5 days a week. In such cases, those people may end up with 10% or 15% less pay for a specific general holiday. Once again, we don't have the total number.
It should be noted that people in that situation who may receive a bit less money for a specific general holiday could end up winning in the long term.
Currently, with the rule of 15 days out of 30, people will be entitled to certain general holidays, but maybe not to all of them. There are nine general holidays. Someone who was sick one day may have missed one of those holidays. If they were temporarily laid off, they may have missed another one. If their schedule was changed, they may have missed a third holiday because they worked less than 15 days. Ultimately, even if the percentage is lower per general holiday, a person will be eligible for nine general holidays and for pay for all of them.
I realize that this is not a clear answer to your question, and that's because we don't have all the figures. However, it's important to point out that we shouldn't only consider pay for a single general holiday. We have to look at the big picture. We think certain people will earn a bit less. There is no doubt about that. However, we believe that, overall, people will probably end up better off.