Very good.
There is no significant change to proposed section 199. This simply specifies where a manager is a professional and working during a general holiday. Again, we've made the language a bit clearer and gender neutral, with no significant change.
For proposed section 200, it's the same thing. We're using “holiday pay” because that's the terminology we're now using, but there's no change. Holiday pay will still be deemed to be wages.
Proposed section 201 is a new section. This is actually something that qualifies the length of service requirement and will be of benefit to employees. We are making the general holiday provisions subject to section 189.
Section 189 specifies that if the business where the employee works is sold or otherwise transferred, the length of service of the employee with the previous employer and the new employer will be deemed to be continuous, so there's no break in service. The purpose of that, of course, is to make sure with regard to the 30-day requirement that if somebody has worked or been employed for 30 days with one employer and the business is sold, they don't have to again work 30 days with the new employer. It will be deemed they have already met the service requirement.