I'll explain why I thought we should proceed in the first way, the way that I suggested. It's simply from the point of view that this is closer to a clause-by-clause situation than a traditional witness situation, where you have questions flowing by rounds. From the point of view of the officials, it might be easier if we had some pointed questions relevant to the area or the clause that they're dealing with, but I'm not fixated on that. It's just the way I had discussed it with the clerk and thought we might go, but I might hear from others.
Go ahead, Mr. McColeman.