CMHC's programs for non-profit housing and those kinds of investment tools have been more and more restricted over the last number of years, but its data make very clear that there is a hugely disproportionate number of people with disabilities who live in core housing need. I'm sorry I don't have the numbers, but I'm sure the clerk or researchers could get them. That has certainly come up in the research we're doing under our CURA SSHRC-funded initiative.
I think there's much to learn from the homelessness partnering strategy as an approach to tackling labour market issues. What that strategy recognizes is that local actors need to figure out the solutions together. They need to come together, put a plan together, and figure out how they're going to create a housing market that people can access in their community. I think a very similar approach can be used in this area as well. Some of the infrastructure that has been tested in that initiative could easily be adapted to the labour market piece to give the federal government more control over some delivery vehicles, because the partnership strategy is about creating some innovative solutions. Right now the federal government doesn't have a vehicle to generate the kind of innovative solutions that the “Rethinking disAbility” labour market panel report talks about. I think that's an example you might consider.