Both cases present specific needs. Episodic mental health issues come to mind, for example. There are specific needs in those cases as well.
How can the federal government know what those specific needs are if it does not communicate with groups on the ground?
Do you think partnerships with groups doing the work on the ground, who know the reality, could prove useful?
Ms. Bergeron, Ms. Flatt or Ms. Robbins, would you care to comment?