I just have a quick story and then the question. When I worked in Fort McMurray with the recreational department, the summer crew, the cut crew, came to us and asked if they could work four 10-hour shifts—they worked 8-hour shifts, five days a week—and we split the crews up. We had two crews going so that we had coverage five days a week, but every second week was a long weekend for them. They'd be able to shut down Thursday, they'd be gone Friday, and then they wouldn't start up again until Tuesday. It was a really neat thing that worked out well for them. We did that all summer.
I moved back to Nova Scotia and I was back in the recreation business. I floated this with the outdoor maintenance crew in the summer, to loosen up some weekend time for them, and they thought it was a great idea. They went back to their union, and their union said, well, sure, you can go with that, but we want time and a half for those last two hours of the day in that 10-hour day. They wouldn't budge on that, so we didn't get what we wanted. With getting gear out and getting gear back, you get a lot more work done with a 10-hour shift. It was something we would have benefited from, the crew would have benefited from, but they said the collective agreement wouldn't allow for that.
We look at StatsCan saying that if we want to get older workers back into the workforce, we need more flexibility in their workday—flexible hours, part-time work, receiving a pension. Have you seen an instance of where management and the union have been able to sit down and agree on some situations through the collective agreement that accommodated older workers coming back?