Yes, I just wanted to comment on starting to charge a user fee. I think the employer has to have some skin in the game here. The employer has to put his or her money on the table, too, and not expect that your department is going to process the LMO at no cost to him or her. That's an important change. I think that's a welcome change. We're going to get some criticism from the business community, but I still think that at the end of the day, if the employer benefits by the use of temporary foreign workers, because that's what they require to get the job done, then they should have to pay a fee at least to allow us, as a government, to recover the costs of processing that.
How will that revenue assist you, as Ms. Chow was concerned about, in the compliance side? Is this going to provide some additional resources that will allow you, then, to make sure that on the compliance side we are ensuring that the employer is following the rules, etc.? Is that sort of part of the work plan, once the bill is passed and you set up your system to charge for fees in the future? Is that the general idea?