Perhaps I could just give a quick answer to that. The bill could potentially have some perverse effects, probably, that were not intended by the drafters. Perhaps I can give you an example.
In the paper we speak about displacement applications. This is a situation where there is an incumbent union and another union that wishes to displace that union and become the bargaining agent. Let's take an example of a bargaining unit of 100 people. We conduct a vote and only 60 people show up and vote: 40 vote for the challenger, the new union that wants to come in; only 20 vote for the incumbent union. My understanding of the way this bill would work is that because neither of them got a majority of the people in the unit, i.e., a majority of the 100 people in the unit, the challenger would lose even though it won two-thirds of the votes of those who voted. The challenger would lose and therefore we would have to dismiss the application. The incumbent would remain in place even though it only had the support of 20 out of 100 people in the unit.