Yes. As I mentioned earlier, the federal jurisdiction is relatively stable and the board has a robust jurisprudence regarding intimidation and coercion.
I took a look at the last 10 years. In the last 10 years, the board has issued over 4,000 decisions globally on all of the matters that come before us. Of those more than 4,000 decisions, only 23 cases involved allegations of intimidation or coercion during an organizing campaign. Of those 23 cases that the board heard and decided, we only found six cases of intimidation and coercion. Four of those cases were intimidation and coercion by an employer. Two of the cases were in a displacement situation where we had two unions vying to represent the same bargaining unit, and the allegations were against the other union.
So that's a total of six upheld in 10 years. It's not a huge problem. I think that's because our jurisprudence is so strong. Everybody knows the rules of the game. They stay within the confines of those rules, and the board has the ability to deal with those outlier cases where someone misbehaves.