Thank you for your comments and your question.
First and foremost, I tried to present the importance of the programs we deliver, as the others did, I'm sure: the youth employment strategy for the young folks; FNICCI, the first nations and Inuit child care initiative for people who need to be in training or work; the ASETS program for employment wage subsidy-type programs, employment training; and of course, the CED program, the community economic development program, which CanNor delivers.
So recommendation number one is these programs are very important to our operations, to the people we serve, and to the way we do business. We will soon be in the last year of ASETS and a new post-ASETS arrangement will be coming forward. The CED program is currently in program renovation; it has been for four years now. As I mentioned, unfortunately the YES program was cut by 18% this year.
We are touching people, we are serving people, and we are reaching people with the programs we deliver. We are getting success from those programs.
It's been mentioned that we are unique, each of us is unique. Our region, Nunavut, is unique. It's very different from a southern first nations reserve. But we still have similar problems, similar challenges, and we have tried to be flexible and use the ASETS program and the YES program.
For example, two years ago we partnered with Baffinland Iron Mines and with the Government of Nunavut to do a work readiness program. The people who were going to be hired to go to Baffinland Iron Mines would have to go through a two-week soft skills training program. They would have to do things like money management. They would have to deal with issues like being away from family—three weeks in, one week out—drug addiction, alcoholism, gambling, things of that nature. All of those soft skills issues, nothing to do with their occupation. That was a pilot program we devised and wrote in Nunavut, a made-for-Nunavut program that Baffinland has now adopted and is continuing.