Yes, I think it's critically important. I'm not an expert on that use of technology, but I know this: we're not going to get from where we are today to where we ought to be unless there's some leadership and somebody decides to undertake that task. People made fun of the federal government for using Kijiji, but there's a core of sense in that, which is that's the way labour market information is going to be available.
The problem is that it's not a coherent use of it, I would say, because Kijiji has various problems with how people take out the jobs once they're filled and once they're no longer available, and whether they ever really were available, etc. The central concept that if you could capture the administrative data, if firms do report their job openings in a coherent way, and you can capture that administrative data, then there it is in real time. You can assemble big data, if I can call it that, about where vacancies are in Canada.
There's a core concept there, but it would take a lot of work and time. I urge the federal government to do what it can in that regard, because that's something that the federal government only, in my view, could do and do well. It will take an investment. It will take time. It will probably be a screw-up for the first, you know, seven months or so because that's the way these projects work. But then it could be very meaningful and we could be a leader among countries. I'm told the Nordic countries are going in that direction. I don't know much about it.