Mr. Brazeau, in your presentation, you said that one of the problems with LMDAs was that they didn't target a specific industry. And, at the same time, you are asking for greater flexibility around what training dollars are used for. Isn't that somewhat of a contradiction?
If we calculate the formula for funding access on an industry basis, as you suggest, rather than using a province's population or needs in relation to the unemployment rate, it could result in an industry not spending all of its training dollars in a given year. And that money could have gone to another industry in need. Such a formula could, in fact, limit the possibility of transferring funding from one industry to another. Conversely, you want greater flexibility. Isn't there a contradiction of sorts between those two things?
What method or formula for funding allocation would you propose to eliminate that contradiction?