We see the amendments being proposed as essential to being able to reduce the backlog. The capacity that is available from the number of members currently in place and the new number of members that could be put in place is a significant driver to improvements, obviously.
Currently, there are 73 full-time members and 21 part-time members that we're accelerating for the government to be able to appoint, and the 73 are in place. The expectation going forward is that the number of members will actually be determined by how quickly both the number of new claims and the number of the existing ones can be reduced.
There's no fixed number. That's part of the reason for the amendment. We want to be able to provide the government and the tribunal with the flexibility to determine how many new members they need and to, over time, adjust that up and down, given that the cap on part-time members will also be lifted.
There's no specific number yet. Really, it will depend on how the volume of processing takes place in the tribunal, as well as in the department.