Quite a few questions are embedded there. I'll try to answer as many as I can.
I think the issue of danger is about clarifying, if I can go back to that. If you read the two definitions side by side, I think there is some rationale why 80% of it is not coming out as dangerous, because I think there is some confusion. Our goal is not to take away responsibility; our intention is to strengthen the internal responsibility system and make it clear so that people can understand what that's all about. So all the other protections.... I think people raised important points. What about pregnant women? What about asbestos? I think we've clarified today that they are still included in “danger”. It's up to the workplaces to address them, to make sure there is a hazards program. It's not to say that you can't work with a hazardous chemical. Inherently, that's what the workplace needs to do, if that is its business. But it's how you are preventing hazards through equipment. How are you addressing it through training and hazards prevention programs?