From the government's perspective, it has seen a project that actually achieves the goal they contracted for, and in the long run it is going to save the taxpayers money because they're not going to make future interventions that are much more costly in that particular scenario and example. RBC is able to glean the money back that they have invested in the social project that has achieved its goal. The organization that coordinates this probably has an opportunity to implement its project on an even bigger scale, because now it has proven it has worked on a much broader target.
It's a win-win-win if they achieve their goal, and it's all based on the evaluation metrics you set up at the front end of the project. You can see why it would actually encourage private sector proponents to invest in these types of projects.
Am I right on that?