Sure, I'm happy to follow up there.
One of the key aspects to this relationship with governments is that impact investors are able to de-risk situations. Our previous questioner mentioned the need to protect taxpayers' money. By putting the risk over on the impact investment side with foundations that, after all, give money away as granters and don't expect to see any of it back, I think we have a situation where we can create capital stacks, if you will, where situations are de-risked in the public interest, and where public and private investment can come in afterwards. That's a really operable methodology that we use to test new approaches.
The other thing is that the private sector is a key player in this discussion. They're not here today exactly, but pension funds, not to mention other endowments—universities, hospitals, and so on—do have an interest in improved social outcomes. I think the government's policy is to create the enabling environment—the language, some models, and some encouragement—to allow this field to grow.