There are a couple of things. One, a lot of the existing tax apparatus is pinching on the ability of social entrepreneurs to do what they want to do. I realize that other people have presented on that, so I won't get into that in detail, but I was a founding member of Social Innovation Generation, or SIG, which essentially launched the social finance task force in Canada. I'm quite sure you have that. That's a fairly straightforward approach, I think.
The bigger role, I think, is for our government funding as it's currently allocated to be leveraged with the other sources of revenue. I'm sorry for repeating myself now, but my fear is that social finance will come out from our federal government and only be seen as “We'll give you the money if you can find other players who will match it”. That is such a limited perspective on what social finance can do.
Somebody mentioned the McConnell foundation. They're a leading private foundation in Canada. They have now spent 15 years trying to think how they can leverage very little money to maximize the impact they are having, and they are proving to be effective. That's what we'd like to see our federal government do as well. Perhaps we could launch some social finance funds that are set up in a way that encourages this new mindset I talked about at the beginning: new ways of working together, new uses of technology to achieve scale, to address these substantive challenges we have in Canada, which we seem to be throwing more and more money at within the existing mindset while the problem only gets worse.
I hope I'm answering the question here.