I have a couple of comments.
When we give a business a loan, we tell them that they have a year to hire at least 20% of the total staff from the population groups I've been talking about. If they're not able to meet that target, we reserve the right to call the loan. So we have a target like that. However, the way we measure the 20% is based on retention. If someone is not working out, then we give the business a quarter to hire someone else to replace that person and we don't change the interest rate if they hire someone else. It's based on retention, as I said. It is incredibly difficult to measure impact in employment. We track things like increase in salaries, increase in positions, the amount of training they receive from the employers, and a number of other things. But at the end of the day from our perspective, it's about retention and customer satisfaction. In this case it's both the candidate and the employer.
Does that answer your question?