I guess at this point, given these new provisions that are being added to the code, our observation is that clearly these changes have been made to ensure that the inspectorate will not be utilized as frequently to deal with situations in which a right to refuse has been invoked in the workplace. This would obviously create a bit of a chill. You can invoke it, but at that point, if the minister chooses to respond and at her discretion to dispatch an inspector, it will be very infrequent, because the government is making argument, obviously, that there is a better use of these resources and that the parties should try to resolve these matters by themselves before asking the government to interfere in any internal matters.
It's important to distinguish places, and I think Katherine alluded to this. Where you have strong and successful health and safety committees with both the competence and the training and a capacity to act properly, yes, it might be very wise, but there are many workplaces that are not unionized and where the workplace committee doesn't have the capacity or the training. Then you are at the discretion of the government as to whether or not they will intervene.
I think workers' health will be further eroded, given the new discretion that the minister has to make a decision as to whether or not she is going to intervene to dispatch an inspector.