I don't want to get into a legal definition of the protective reassignment provisions in the Canada Labour Code, which are a lot weaker already than the ones that exist in Quebec. I don't want to get into the details of that.
What's clear is that if the hazard is in relation to a pregnancy and the worker has the right to ask for reassignment under the legislation, is that worker going to get more easily reassigned with a more difficult definition of danger? I don't think so. For men, it's manifest that they're no longer covered, right? It's really easy to see that reproductive hazards for men would no longer be covered under this definition of danger. For women, there are provisions for requesting reassignment without pay. They're not necessarily very....