There is, and obviously it depends on the programs. I think I would pull out two in particular, though, Mr. Eglinski.
The first is that, over at least the past 15 to 20 years within the U.K., we have increasingly begun to look, from a public policy perspective, at how government can set up specialist and expert organizations to play a role within this market. So for example, we moved from government providing large direct investment funds to government setting up a social investment wholesaler that was independent of government. In a way, that was to do two things: to protect it from the challenges of operating in a political environment, and secondly, to build capability within the system and to build the market itself, rather than government being the biggest player.
I think the second thing, which we have not cracked yet within the U.K. and a lot of our focus is now looking at it, is essentially a constant challenge of public policy. How do you stop this being top down? How do you really involve the service beneficiaries or the social enterprises or social sector organizations in the design of these things that are essentially for their benefit? That is a crucial area in the U.K., which we are increasingly looking at.