The short answer is no, though now we are looking at areas in which we can support this to happen. We've found within the U.K. that often, although there is no prohibition to doing social investment, unless it's expressly admitted, people feel it's implicitly prohibited.
A number of the political parties are focusing now on how you can build out regulation that more expressly admits and allows the idea of looking at issues beyond financial returns, particularly for the managers of money. We haven't had to look, for example, at the role of the regulation around charities' ability to take on investment. I know that has been an issue that's being looked at within the Canadian context.