I'll just add quickly to that.
It largely speaks to the point of strength-based assets in our community. I think that's one of the contributions that many small organizations have to contribute to some of these projects. For example, in the U.K., when they originally started with one of their social impact funds, they started with four key areas of service delivery that they looked at. By the end of the program, they had 11 services that were key services that were being offered. Over the course of that service you bring in strength-based assets. There's an opportunity to do that because of the flexible model for funding. I think that's an important way to ensure that the organizations are actually included rather than excluded. It comes down to fundamentally the policy structures and intentional design to ensure that those issues that CASW has concerns with are mitigated. I think those are valid concerns but they can be mitigated through intentional design.