Yes, absolutely. I think I can add to that as well. I would say that a lot of the presentation regarding standard setting and those kinds of principle-based approaches to engagement is actually something we would probably be very much for, because one of the challenges often is actually seeing the clarity and consistency in working with public sector partners and knowing what their priorities are among the potentially competing priorities within these tools.
I'll just give some examples of that. You may very well prioritize knowledge creation, in which case having very rigorous evaluations that have more statistical significance, that require larger numbers may be a priority. Conversely, you may have a very high priority on value for money, in which case the focus really needs to be very much on variable costs, really focused on what kind of ramp-down of other services would need to take place to monetize savings. Those aren't always the same priorities and there's prioritization among them relatively. Having that clarity has certainly been a challenge, as well as getting folks past.... Especially since this is a new tool, sometimes there's been so much interest that there's a lack of clarity around issue selection at least for some of these first pilots, some of these first tools.
Justin, is there anything you'd like to add?