Sure. I have to admit, whenever I hear about a national strategy for X, Y, or Z—there's an endless list, and you could fill this room with proposals for national strategies—what I often actually hear is a national strategy for blank cheques for various other orders of government or organizations. Often those national strategies, I think, are essentially an expression of what economists would call rent-seeking behaviour.
I believe in, as you've just intimated, the principle of subsidiarity. I believe that those orders of government, those organs of civil society, that are closer to real people and their lives on the ground are much more effective and efficient at solving social problems than the office towers in Ottawa. That's why, as a general philosophical statement, I think all of this talk about national strategies misses the point. It's the folks in Kamloops who know that they have a particular population, with particular needs with respect to homelessness, who are going to be far more effective. If we can be there to support them through things such as the homelessness partnership strategy, I think—I know—we'll get better results.