That's a very broad question.
I would say that your last point is quite right. I hear some interest groups—I won't mention names....Canadian Federation of Students—suggesting that there be basically “free” post-secondary education, of course it's not free. It's money taxed from people, taxed from wealth creators, taxed from small business people who are already working seven days a week to keep their heads above water.
The data on this are clear and irrefutable, that those kinds of transfers, while important—and we of course have to support post-secondary education—represent an upward transfer of income in our society, often from working families or what we could call blue-collar families, or families of modest means, to families higher up the income spectrum.
I wish the NDP would join us on this. We have to be very careful. We have to look at post-secondary education policy through a social equity lens. That's why our government, by the way, created the post-secondary education savings plan, which puts a grant into those accounts for low-income families. They may not have the capacity to save, but we're going to help to prime the pump so that when their kids turn 18, they have a few thousand dollars in the account and then the dream of university becomes a reality for them. That's the kind of thing we are doing for them right now in federal and post-secondary education policy.