The processes have different outcomes, and under C-62, it is the bargaining agent who will be in a position to choose which one of the two processes they wish to adopt.
In the first case, as I indicated to Madam Trudel, when they're in the conciliation strike, the parties—the bargaining agent and the employer—would submit their positions to a public interest commission and that public interest commission would provide a report after their analysis, but unless the parties choose otherwise, the report is non-binding.
Consequently, once the report is released, steps are taken, and the bargaining unit can be in a strike position. They could strategically, at the beginning of the round, decide that instead of that, they would prefer the arbitration route. In that case, they again submit their positions to an arbitrator, but that arbitrator's report is binding on the parties, so it ends the discussion. It puts the final decision in regard to that round in the hands of someone else completely.