Thank you, Mr. Chair.
Thank you very much for your presentations, all of you. This has been a really thought-provoking discussion, and I'm glad we're having it.
I'm going to try to use plain language as much as I can, Mr. Earle. Thank you for that.
I want to go back to timelines and deadlines, because I feel that we started talking about it and then moved away from the real point.
On the day this bill is passed, nothing has to happen. Let's go back to that. That is the problem, isn't it?
What are some of the practical ways...? They're not the big-picture ways, maybe, but there are some practical ways for us to address that right now, aren't there? Maybe all of you can talk about what you would envision. Right now, on the day this passes, what should we be giving notice of? I'm not trying to hint around at an amendment, but I'll give you an example of what it could be.
We'll get to those amendments and that question afterwards, Marianne.
It could be that from the day this passes, everybody who is involved has 18 months to come up with a plan, or they have six months to formulate the advisory committee.... What kinds of deadlines do you think are most practical for our role here in the limited amount of time that we have to study this? What do you think we should be really concentrating on?
Who wants to go first? It looks like we have a few people thinking.