Focusing on the role of the accessibility commissioner, I believe that person could interpret their role in a very significant way, which would continue to educate all Canadians.
The mechanism of reporting to Parliament could be accelerated if that person were an independent officer of Parliament. That's something that we suggested. It's currently not going to be part of this bill.
I believe that role and those timelines will be adequate. We can learn from them. It's really about the uptake and the support from the community, the stakeholders, that is taken once those reports are made, and making sure that all Canadians have access to the reports, whether it's through social media or other means.
In my opinion, the timelines may be a good start. We'll be informed on whether they're adequate or not by the success of the role of the accessibility commissioner.
Fundamentally, the focus should be on that commissioner making all Canadians aware of these issues. The majority of Canadians, I believe, would like to support the inclusiveness for all persons with disability, but there are many unintended consequences. We see that in the built environment and the to-be-built environment. There are big issues on transportation, provincially and municipally, that need to be addressed, because transportation is a barrier for a person whether they need to seek employment or get to employment or get to health care, education, etc.
I want to reiterate a point that was made earlier on voting. Voting municipally and provincially is a huge issue. The barriers are significant, and they haven't been cured. Again, we need a systemic response to those—