Once again we have an issue where it is the accessibility commissioner who should be in charge here, not the CRTC. The issue of splintering the regulatory oversight is a misguided approach and we can correct course with an amendment like this and the others that were already defeated.
I sound like I'm taking a defeatist attitude. But it is important that the accessibility commissioner is the entity that is in charge—truly in charge.
(Amendment negatived [See Minutes of Proceedings])
(Clause 52 agreed to)
(On clause 53)