Dan Ruimy at the Human Resources, Skills and Social Development and the Status of Persons with Disabilities Committee

On November 8th, 2018. See this statement in context.

November 8th, 2018 / noon

Liberal

Dan Ruimy Liberal Pitt Meadows—Maple Ridge, BC

I know we had conversations. I'm just trying to think of what the witnesses were telling us.

Honestly, it's because there are two instances of “emotional harm”. We're making it more consistent throughout the entire act. Why would you have two sections referring to it as “emotional harm”, when we're referring to it as “psychological harm”?

See context to find out what was said next.