Thank you very much.
Is there any further discussion on LIB-20?
Oh, you want to withdraw it. Sorry, I thought you said you want to move on with the motion.
Evidence of meeting #124 for Human Resources, Skills and Social Development and the Status of Persons with Disabilities in the 42nd Parliament, 1st session. (The original version is on Parliament’s site, as are the minutes.) The winning word was clause.
A video is available from Parliament.
The Vice-Chair Mr. John Barlow
Thank you very much.
Is there any further discussion on LIB-20?
Oh, you want to withdraw it. Sorry, I thought you said you want to move on with the motion.
November 8th, 2018 / 8:55 a.m.
Liberal
The Vice-Chair Mr. John Barlow
Okay, we'll reconvene.
Just so we're clear, LIB-20 has been withdrawn.
We're still on clause 47, but we move to NDP-13.
Conservative
NDP
Cheryl Hardcastle NDP Windsor—Tecumseh, ON
Mr. Chair, the government claims to place importance on its relationship with labour. This is an example of having public service employees, from PSAC in particular, talk to us about this issue. In most cases, the people living with disabilities who are coming forward will be doing so through a bargaining agent, because they are part of a collective agreement. They are part of, for instance, the PSAC. Therefore, we need to acknowledge that collective agreements are a part of this.
The interface that will take place because of this legislation will include collective agreements, and it must be articulated.
(Amendment negatived [See Minutes of Proceedings])
Liberal
Wayne Long Liberal Saint John—Rothesay, NB
Mr. Chair, this is consequential to the amendments we made in LIB-14. I can read it, but it's basically the same.
The Vice-Chair Mr. John Barlow
No. I appreciate that.
(Amendment agreed to [See Minutes of Proceedings])
Liberal
Bobby Morrissey Liberal Egmont, PE
Chair, before we vote on clause 47, could I have consent to go back just to clarify on LIB-19, it was a subamendment? I'm not sure it that was clear when it was voted on. I can read in the exact text.
Liberal
Wayne Long Liberal Saint John—Rothesay, NB
We meant to do a subamendment, but we didn't. So we're looking for consent to—
Liberal
Wayne Long Liberal Saint John—Rothesay, NB
Can we enter that as a separate amendment? No? Do we just leave it?