The examples were removed slowly. By the time we got to 2012, there were no examples at all. The CRA has a document called RC4064, and those examples are in it, but most doctors aren't going to go and hunt down documents from CRA.
In my written submission, I have one of the examples. It's a very important example that CRA used. It has to do with someone who has psychotic disorder. It recognizes that someone like that is not continuously psychotic all the time. The example indicates that an individual may have a number of psychotic episodes during the year. It recognizes that the condition is permanent. They're not continuously psychotic, but they do require daily supervision. That was a very interesting example. Someone with dementia, for example, may be perceived to be living independently on their own and in their own home, but they're not really independent because somebody else is looking after their finances or getting Meals on Wheels, etc. That was a very important example.
There were also examples of children with autism. Those examples are gone. The form is so basic now. I've been fighting the 90% for years. We've brought up this issue, and hopefully, with our disability advisory committee, we'll be able to get that out. “All or substantially all of the time” is not terrific, but at least it doesn't put a timeline onto the physicians.