Okay.
I want to follow on Scott's concern about wage suppression. I know that the official opposition had identified, in one of they S.O. 31s, wage stagnation as an issue, so I know it's one that all of parliament is seized with. If you look at the stats coming out of the States, you'll see the same thing—great employment levels, record—but wage stagnation is a huge factor.
I have just a quick example. There are 20,000 people in the seafood processing industry in Atlantic Canada. There are 400 processors. We're hearing from some that they can't find people. There are no temporary foreign workers in Newfoundland, and very few in Nova Scotia and all that. The handful of companies that are using that program are the ones that aren't paying as high a wage as the others. It is absolutely a case of wages not being high enough.
With regard to the fact that you've identified that 60% of your members have increased salaries, is there a deeper dive on that? Do you have a deeper drill-down on that information? It would be neat to see the comparison: What are the increases? What sectors? Are some sectors over others? If you have more information on that, that would be very valuable to the committee in its deliberations.