I am not tabling it, but I would like to explain my point of order. I have tabled this motion six times, I believe, over the past year, once with the ministers present. I would like to now read this motion so that everyone understands what I am talking about.
That the Committee undertake a study of a minimum of six meetings on the Employment Insurance sickness benefits program to examine especially, but not exclusively; a. if the program meets the real needs of the claimants; b. the impact of the length of benefits on the claimants and on their recovery; c. the program accessibility; d. the population affected by this program and their characteristics; and that it hear, not limited to this list, witnesses from the health sector, former claimants or groups representing them, the Minister of Families, Children and Social Development, and that it report on its conclusions to the House.
Why am I raising a point of order, Mr. Chair? Since last May, I have tried to move this motion before the committee on several occasions. That is how we have to do things. Each time, there is a request to adjourn and, each time, the government representatives have refused to vote on my motion.
Until now, I've told myself that this was their choice, but, last week, when, in the House calendar...