I think it doesn't answer all of the issues that could arise between a potential employer and a migrant worker. You never know what's going to happen behind closed doors.
I think there are two important things to highlight. First, migrant workers are not necessarily informed or educated as to the system and they could be told one thing by a person whom they're working for, such as that they need to pay for certain fees or that they need to work a certain number of hours. So I think there are still problems with regard to exploitation. Ms. Paglingayen was correct in saying that the source of this issue is the precariousness of the status, and the promise of more permanent status is the way to help take away that exploitation.
The second way I think to do this is through greater enforcement. There is a lot of activity as of late looking at whether people are adhering to the rules or not, but the issue is that the persons who are working are often punished, as opposed to the persons who are employing these people. I think we need to look at the kinds of enforcement that are taking place and the rules associated with enforcement, and the efforts being made with regards to that should be examined in particular.