Okay. So they are subject to the refusal to process.
I do know that in the Whistler case, which I'm familiar with, they made particular use of the international mobility program. The actual use of what's now called the temporary foreign worker program was surprisingly small, but use was very significant in the international mobility program, including the international experience Canada program. I think that at some point that program was misunderstood by some stakeholders as actually being the TFW program, where the refusal-to-process rule was in play. They were historic users of the international mobility program and they continue to be.