The rules that we design for firms and for businesses—which generally have been encouraged, as I said, through the steady increase in globalization, freer trade and more competition—put them in a position where the contracts and the employment arrangements they set out for workers essentially fall within the competitive environment that they must function within. So you can't really look at them as equal since they are two very distinct kinds of policies. If we are setting up and encouraging firms to be more competitive—and these are the rules we're setting in place for them to compete on the bottom line more, to compete internationally—then you have to understand why there are issues with precarity and why there are issues with employment arrangements, which some people have spoken about today.
I'm saying that the two things are not easily separated at the end of the day. There's only so much security to go around. It exists in the finite, so we have to be very thoughtful about how we design our overall frameworks of policies—be they on labour legislation, on employment insurance or on other forms of income support—and how we think about those to say, okay, this is the competitive environment that businesses are in; they need to operate here; they are the creators of wealth. We need to be very open-minded about how we go about things.