Thank you, Mr. Chair.
Good afternoon, Mr. Sheehan.
As you showed in your presentation, underlying your motion is our need to develop a definition. You heard me when I asked several witnesses who appeared before the committee whether we could use the definition from the International Labour Organization as a basis. You said earlier that there is no consensus, and all the witnesses told me it was difficult to provide a precise definition because it will not necessarily be restrictive. On the one hand, your motion seeks to develop a definition to target government objectives and solutions on precarious employment. On the other hand, we also know that a definition will not help Canadians who are currently faced with an emergency.
In light of the testimony that shows how difficult it is to develop a definition, which is really the basis of your motion, what could we recommend to the government?