I'm looking forward to the testimony that will be coming after me, but I think that, to begin with, obviously, at the crux of it is that we need a national definition on precarious work, because, without it, we are using a whole bunch of different thoughts and different studies on what precarity is. Once it is defined, I believe that the actions they can take.... As I've said in my speeches in the House, never has the world moved this quickly, nor will it ever move this slowly.
There are so many changes happening that I think the government needs to take a look at different ways in which they can introduce policies and potentially legislation dealing with people working precariously. You can start also at home, if you will. I mean, the government has the purview and can move rather quickly on what it does within itself in identifying who may fit the definition of precarious work working either for the federal government or in federally regulated industries, as they have. I think about pay equity and some of the proactive legislation that was passed by Parliament related to that.