Two of the measurements that you've pointed to in the deck you provided, Mr. Heisz, measure the incomes of people versus the cost of basic necessities. I refer to the market basket measurement, which takes a whole basket of goods that are required to be part of a society. LICO, low-income cut-off, is based on the 1992 share of income that was required for some basic necessities at that time.
We know that taxes on carbon raise disproportionately the prices of basic necessities—fuel, heat, electricity, food. We also know that low-income people have to spend disproportionately large amounts of money on those basic necessities. When those prices go up, is it not logical to assume that poverty rates go up with them?