I have another question for you, Brad, and we haven't even started talking about a new carbon tax thrown into the mix, which will add another $1,000 to $2,500 per family on top of things.
There's an answer here that none of us are talking about. The reason I'm such a promoter of the development of our natural resources is this. As we hear from Aaron, we're getting down to a ratio of 3:10 in terms of working people versus those who are going to need services. The obvious answer to me is that we need to be developing some way to pay for all of this. We're with CARP; we're with all these particular plans; we want to see our seniors taken care of. But at the end of the day, that tax-paying family, that middle-income family, has to pay the bill.
Brad, you had some comments that you wanted to change the clawbacks to the GIS. Can you speak to that quickly?